AES+F, the video artwork collective previously primarily based in Moscow that has damaged all ties with Russian state establishments for the reason that invasion of Ukraine and halted all tasks in Russia “till this regime is now not in energy”, is sponsoring artists from Russia and Ukraine for a residency in Brooklyn, New York.
The collective’s involvement with the influential Worldwide Studio and Curatorial Program (ISCP), which supplies house for worldwide artists and curators at a former manufacturing unit house in Brooklyn, started in 2020 and has enabled the participation of Pavlo Grazhdanskij, who’s initially from Kharkiv, one of many cites Russian forces have bombarded most extensively for the reason that 24 February invasion. Grazhdanskij was in Nickel, in northern Russia’s Murmansk area, making ready for a cross-border efficiency with Norwegian sound artist Tine Surel Lange on the Barents Spektakel 2022 when the invasion started. That challenge instantly shut down.
“It was a piece about anxiousness and making an attempt to deal with it,” Grazhdanskij says. He needed to instantly pack up and flee Russia through a circuitous route. His preliminary try to go away through Estonia failed, he says, after he was interrogated on the border about his connections in Ukraine and whether or not he “feels hatred for workers of the FSB”, Russia’s safety service. He lastly made it out by passing by way of Belarus, Latvia after which Turkey.
Tensions between Russia and the West had been already a problem when AES+F’s residency sponsorship, with its purpose of supporting Russian artists, launched in 2020 after a delay on account of Covid-19. The Russian artist Ilya Fedotov-Fedorov is at the moment in residence at ISCP due to AES+F, and his personal experiences inform a narrative of life in Russia changing into more and more untenable for artists—not least for him after popping out as homosexual and addressing queer and transgender themes in his efficiency video works, which incorporate dance and masks.
The state of affairs has been compounded by the Kremlin’s home clampdown within the wake of the invasion, which suggests artists who left Russia can not safely return. The ambiance in Russia, Fedotov-Fedorov says, has resulted in “enemies being created”, with Ukrainians, gays and what are derogatorily termed “European values” by state propaganda lumped into one broad class.
AES+F stated in a press release that “we’ve got to assist Ukraine and Ukrainians” and “we started within the space that’s extra acquainted to us, offering assist to artists in tough conditions”. ISCP, stated AES+F, “was very receptive to our need to assist our Ukrainian colleague” and may be very supportive of Fedotov-Fedorov as properly. “We all know that what folks discover vital are actual deeds and intentions, not slogans,” the collective stated.
AES+F has additionally been serving to Vera Nanivskaya, “our outdated Ukrainian good friend” who organised the collective’s “first exhibitions in Europe together with Ukrainian artists”, the collective wrote in an Instagram submit. Nanivskaya has turned her artwork residency within the Carpathian Mountains in western Ukraine right into a shelter for refugees. “Within the final couple of weeks Vera has additionally been receiving our bodies of those that died on the street, and has been organising their burials,” the collective wrote in April.
Each Grazhdanskij and Fedotov-Fedorov participated in ISCP’s spring open studios occasion in April. Fedotov-Fedorov, who studied genetics earlier than he grew to become an artist, makes drawings, installations and performances which can be closely influenced by the pure world. In the course of the open studios occasion, he participated in a chat with curator Francesca Altamura.
Grazhdanskij was born in Kharkiv in 1991, residing his complete life in impartial Ukraine. The town is close to the Russian border and areas of japanese Ukraine which were in a state of struggle since 2014. He has used pictures, video and textual content to deal with his roots within the metropolis and the trauma of Ukrainian-Russian relations. He has additionally lived in St. Petersburg in Russia, the place he studied on the Chto Delat collective’s College of Engaged Artwork.
In Kharkiv, Grazhdanskij stated, most works he made lately had addressed the subject of struggle. One wall of his studio at ISCP is lined with pictures of Kharkiv discovered on the web, an try and doc the place he grew up. One other wall options has printouts of geolocation knowledge from Bellingcat (an investigative journalism group for which he’s an open-source intelligence volunteer) used to determine the websites of Russian strikes in Ukraine. The artist, who has additionally expressed solidarity with workers’ makes an attempt to unionise on the PinchukArtCenter in Kyiv, says that “in my circle 90% had been most likely compelled to go away” residence in Ukraine and “those that didn’t depart are [civilian] volunteers or volunteer fighters”.
In a subsequent message, Grazhdanskij described the ache of residing the struggle at a distance whereas additionally being utterly consumed by it. “I’m not right here, and each second of any day I take into consideration the struggle, once I sleep I see the information,” he wrote. “I take advantage of all my sources to assist folks in Ukraine, my mates can name me at any time and get help. I ship most of my stipend to individuals who haven’t got jobs—who needed to flee the struggle. And day-after-day I’m desirous about how I might help, from right here, I’m volunteering on the humanitarian assist centre for Ukraine. I pray.”
The expertise has additionally crystallised for him the views of Russians and Russian artists on the struggle. “For folks in or from Russia this struggle doesn’t exist in the identical means, scale, or perhaps it’s not hurting a lot,” he wrote. “Of all of the Russian artists I do know personally, I do know solely two of them who’re aching for Ukraine simply as a lot, and much more than I do now. Two folks out of greater than 100? Two folks out of 100 for whom this can be a private tragedy.”
Consequently, he wrote, he doesn’t assume a joint dialogue is feasible now. “We are able to meet and discuss,” he wrote, “however it may possibly’t be an image of unity or dialog—due to this distinction.”