- South Korea delays its Digital Asset Basic Law to 2026 amid disputes over stablecoin oversight authority.
- Lawmakers pause crypto legislation as regulators clash on who should control stablecoin reserves and enforcement.
- Regulatory uncertainty grows as Korea weighs investor protection against monetary control and innovation.
South Korea’s push to formalise crypto regulation has slowed again, with authorities confirming that the Digital Asset Basic Law will not be submitted until 2026.
The delay highlights deep divisions over how stablecoins should be supervised in one of Asia’s most active digital asset markets, even as crypto products become more tightly linked to the wider financial system.
The setback does not reflect a lack of interest in regulation.
Instead, it underlines how complex stablecoin oversight has become for policymakers, balancing innovation, financial stability, and monetary control.
With no agreement yet on who should hold ultimate authority, lawmakers have opted to pause rather than advance a bill with unresolved structural gaps.
Purpose of the proposed law
The Digital Asset Basic Law is intended to act as the backbone of South Korea’s crypto framework.
A core aim is investor protection, achieved by holding digital asset operators to stricter legal standards than before.
One of the most significant proposals is the introduction of no-fault liability, which would make operators responsible for user losses even if negligence cannot be proven.
Another pillar of the bill focuses on reducing systemic risk from stablecoins. The draft requires issuers to maintain reserves exceeding 100% of the circulating supply.
These reserves must be held at banks or approved institutions, with clear separation from the issuer’s own balance sheet.
The structure is designed to limit contagion risks if a stablecoin issuer fails.
Stablecoins and regulatory control
Stablecoins have emerged as the main fault line in the debate. While regulators broadly agree that stronger oversight is necessary, they remain split on who should enforce reserve rules and supervision.
The Financial Services Commission and the Bank of Korea have yet to align on how responsibilities should be divided.
These disagreements have complicated decisions around licensing, enforcement powers, and the treatment of reserve assets.
Rather than pushing through a compromised framework, authorities have delayed the bill to allow further coordination between financial regulators and monetary authorities.
Market uncertainty grows
The postponement has not triggered an immediate market reaction, but it adds another layer of uncertainty for crypto firms operating in South Korea.
Exchanges, payment providers, and stablecoin issuers continue to expand in an environment where long-term regulatory expectations remain unclear.
Uncertainty can have practical effects.
Firms may slow product launches, delay investment decisions, or consider shifting certain operations to jurisdictions with clearer rules.
For investors, the absence of a completed framework complicates assessments of risk and compliance.
Politics and monetary strategy
Political dynamics are also shaping the timeline. The ruling Democratic Party is now working to merge several lawmaker proposals into a revised digital asset bill.
At the same time, strategic concerns around monetary sovereignty are becoming more prominent.
President Lee Jae Myung has identified a Korean won-backed stablecoin as a national priority, arguing that it could counter the growing dominance of US dollar-linked stablecoins in global crypto markets.
These ambitions increase pressure on regulators to ensure that any framework aligns with broader monetary policy goals.
The delayed Digital Asset Basic Law is meant to represent the second phase of South Korea’s crypto regulation.
The first phase, already in force, targeted unfair trading practices.
