“The court declines to find as a matter of law that a reasonable investor would have derived any expectation of profit from general cryptocurrency market trends, as opposed to Ripple’s efforts to facilitate XRP’s use in cross-border payments, among other things,” Hamilton wrote. “Accordingly, the [court] cannot find as a matter of law that Ripple’s conduct would not have led a reasonable investor to have an expectation of profit due to the efforts of others.”
Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure Tennessee’s sports betting regulator has ordered Polymarket,...
Willy Woo rejects claims that Bitcoin’s four‑year cycle has ended, arguing that price data still supports the traditional rhythm until...
XRP is now back to trading just above the $2 level after an early January rally briefly carried its price...
Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure Despite shifting market dynamics and evolving macro...
Following the recent bullish momentum seen early in the year, the Bitcoin price has displayed a bit of correctional movement...
