“The court declines to find as a matter of law that a reasonable investor would have derived any expectation of profit from general cryptocurrency market trends, as opposed to Ripple’s efforts to facilitate XRP’s use in cross-border payments, among other things,” Hamilton wrote. “Accordingly, the [court] cannot find as a matter of law that Ripple’s conduct would not have led a reasonable investor to have an expectation of profit due to the efforts of others.”
Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure Despite shifting market dynamics and evolving macro...
Following the recent bullish momentum seen early in the year, the Bitcoin price has displayed a bit of correctional movement...
After a lengthy disappearing act—last spotted in November 2024—the elusive 2010-era mega whale has resurfaced yet again, finally rousing 2,000...
Crypto expert Plan C has alluded to the business cycle to explain why the Bitcoin top isn’t in despite the...
Tether has partnered with the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime to combat illicit cryptocurrency activity and strengthen Africa’s...
