Charles Hoskinson raised the possibility of splitting Cardano after the collapse of one of its best-known ecosystem tools exposed a deeper fight over money, governance, and who has the power to keep builders alive on the network.
This week, the Cardano founder floated what he called a “nuclear option,” saying a new Cardano could be launched through proof of burn if the existing ecosystem cannot change how it funds and commercializes projects.
The statement came after TapTools, one of Cardano’s most widely used analytics and infrastructure platforms, said it would begin winding down operations over the next two weeks following leadership departures, mounting costs, and the loss of key technical capacity.
Hoskinson responded with a long, emotional address that turned a project closure into a broader indictment of Cardano’s governance and commercial strategy.
Hours later, he posted on X:
I’m taking a break. TTYL.
More Cardano DeFi apps will die, Hoskinson warns
Hoskinson said TapTools’ closure was unlikely to be an isolated failure, saying:
This year is going to be very hard, especially the second half of the year for Cardano. We are probably going to see more dApps in DeFi die and a consolidation happen
The warning landed as Cardano’s DeFi economy remained small by broader crypto standards and under renewed strain.
DeFiLlama data showed about $115 million in total value locked on Cardano, with the network’s DeFi TVL down more than 5% over 24 hours. Cardano’s 24-hour DEX volume stood near $6.3 million, while its stablecoin market was roughly $55 million.
Those figures point to the commercial problem behind Hoskinson’s remarks. Cardano still has a large brand and a committed community, but the financial activity available to sustain infrastructure providers, exchanges, lending apps, and analytics platforms remains limited.
For teams that rely on subscriptions, API revenue, token activity, treasury funding, or outside investment, a thin market can quickly become an operating crisis.
Indeed, TapTools had framed its closure as the result of that pressure rather than a loss of belief in Cardano.
The platform said it had served more than 1 million users, supported hundreds of projects through its API, published hundreds of articles, and generated hundreds of millions of social impressions for Cardano builders.
However, the team said the departure of co-founders, including its chief technology officer and chief operating officer, had created a gap it could not quickly repair. A backend developer had stepped into the CTO role, but that replacement also decided to leave.
The company said it had tried to lower infrastructure costs, improve efficiency, and develop new products. Still, it concluded that it could not responsibly commit to the future without a credible acquisition path or fresh resources.
For Hoskinson, the announcement confirmed a problem he said had been visible for months. He said TapTools had been part of his daily routine and called its closure a loss for the broader ecosystem.
He also pointed to JPEG Store as another sign that older Cardano projects were struggling to survive the current cycle. He added:
I would suspect others are coming very soon. There’s going to be a wave of failures in the ecosystem.
The founder says he does not hold the levers
Hoskinson’s central argument was that Cardano’s public market still treats him as the person responsible for the network’s direction, even though the formal powers needed to change that direction now sit elsewhere.
He said he does not control Cardano’s treasury, does not hold governance keys, cannot initiate a hard fork, cannot change protocol parameters, and does not own the Cardano trademark.
He said the resources created to grow and govern the ecosystem were assigned to separate entities rather than to him personally.
The comments cut into one of Cardano’s most sensitive political tensions. The network has spent years moving toward community governance, with delegated representatives, treasury rules, and other bodies taking on greater responsibility for funding and protocol decisions.
That structure limits founder control by design. It also means there is no single executive authority able to rescue struggling businesses, redirect treasury funds, or impose a commercial strategy when market conditions worsen.
Hoskinson said he had proposed multiple ways to prepare for that pressure, including a sovereign wealth fund, stablecoin reserves, an ecosystem index, and acquisitions of struggling infrastructure projects.
He argued those efforts were either rejected, delayed, or criticized by voters and community members who opposed spending treasury funds or feared centralization.
He noted:
There is a deranged psychopathy that has infected Cardano. You can see it at the bottom of each of my tweets. There are people whose only purpose now is to attack me. Every video I make, every tweet, every output, it is a growing chorus.
His frustration was aimed at that contradiction. When he tries to acquire or commercialize projects, he said critics accuse him of consolidating power. When he does not intervene, those same critics blame him for allowing builders to fail.
He stated:
You do not want commercialization, but then you punish everybody when commercialization does not occur. You say Cardano is not a ghost chain, but the things needed to prevent that, you do not care about.
Cardano’s treasury politics move into the market
The speech landed at a difficult moment for Cardano as the blockchain network’s ADA token fell below $0.20 for the first time in more than five years.
This extends a yearlong decline that has erased much of the token’s value and deepened pressure on builders whose businesses depend on user activity, treasury funding, or investor confidence.
Whoops, looks like there was a problem. Please try again.
You’re subscribed. Welcome aboard.
Meanwhile, the decline has also sharpened the debate over whether Cardano’s governance system can fund growth quickly enough to keep pace with rival blockchain ecosystems.
According to Hoskinson:
Every person who has tried to use the treasury for commercialization gets attacked. Every program has to be pushed through with enormous effort to reach two-thirds voting, and most people do not have the political power, will or grit to get through that process.
For context, Cardano’s flagship 2026 Summit in Singapore was canceled after a treasury funding proposal failed to meet the two-thirds approval threshold required under the network’s governance rules.
Hoskinson argued that Cardano’s technology has continued to advance, citing expected work such as Leios. But he said technology alone would not be enough if the ecosystem could not fund businesses, support builders, and create incentives for commercial use.
His remarks were unusually blunt. He accused parts of the community of creating a hostile environment for builders and said some critics appeared more interested in proving Cardano had failed than helping the network recover.
According to him:
We as a community have to have a schism. We can no longer admit people whose only purpose is to burn the entire ecosystem down. It is the builders versus the non-builders, the doers versus the pessimists and cynics.
He said teams seeking treasury money or commercial support are often attacked before and after funding votes, making the system unattractive for serious operators.
A break raises the stakes
Hoskinson did not announce a formal exit from Cardano. His later post saying he was taking a break appeared to reflect exhaustion with the public fight rather than a resignation from the ecosystem.
Still, the timing amplified the message. A founder who remains Cardano’s most recognizable public advocate had just told the community that more projects may collapse, that he lacks the authority to stop it, and that the network must choose leadership, strategy, and funding mechanisms or risk managing decline.
Meanwhile, he pointed out that his “nuclear option” could be a way to separate builders from hostile critics and reset tokenomics and institutional funding.
He stated:
There are options. We could launch a new Cardano and have a proof of burn. That would be the most extreme option because those people would not migrate. They would be left behind in the environment they created, with no market, no volume and no commercialization. That is the nuclear option.
That suggestion reflected how far the conflict has moved from routine governance debate. Hoskinson’s complaint is no longer simply that voters rejected a proposal or that ADA’s price has fallen.
He argues that Cardano lacks an executive function capable of turning treasury resources, technical progress, and community support into a coordinated growth plan.
The consequences are now visible through business closures. TapTools said it remained open to acquisition or sustainable funding, but its shutdown notice gave Cardano a concrete example of what can happen when useful infrastructure cannot cover costs or retain key staff.
Considering this, Hoskinson told delegators to examine whether their DReps are helping the ecosystem grow or blocking the decisions needed to support builders.
He urged the community to take a week, study the failures, and decide whether it wants constitutional changes, treasury changes, executive changes, or even a more radical protocol path.
