Franklin Templeton, the $1.78 trillion asset management firm, is attempting to push cryptocurrency deeper into conventional investment portfolios with a new proposal that would automatically redirect stock dividends into Bitcoin exposure.
On June 18, the asset manager filed paperwork with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to launch two exchange-traded funds that would hold US equities while filtering corporate payouts into digital asset investments.
The proposed funds, the Franklin US Equity Bitcoin DRIP Index ETF and the Franklin US Innovation Bitcoin DRIP Index ETF, would combine one of Wall Street’s most established practices, dividend reinvestment, with exposure to the world’s largest cryptocurrency.
The structure would give investors a primary base in large US stocks while using income generated by those companies to slowly accumulate Bitcoin-linked assets. That design avoids requiring investors to make a direct upfront allocation to crypto, instead building the position over time through a rules-based mechanism.
This filing reflects how major financial institutions are looking beyond standard spot Bitcoin funds and toward more complex portfolio products.
After the first wave of US spot Bitcoin ETFs solved the basic access problem, issuers are now experimenting with strategies that wrap the asset inside income, options, and allocation frameworks familiar to financial advisers and brokerage investors.
Notably, Franklin already operates in the digital asset market through the Franklin Bitcoin ETF, which trades under the ticker EZBC. The fund has attracted about $330 million in cumulative net inflows and manages roughly $360 million in assets, giving the firm a foothold in a category dominated by larger rivals.
The new filing suggests Franklin is seeking a more specialized lane. Rather than compete only through a spot Bitcoin wrapper, the firm is proposing a product that could appeal to investors who are comfortable with equity ETFs but less willing to buy Bitcoin directly.
Dividends become the Bitcoin entry point
The two proposed ETFs would function as passive index trackers built around VettaFi benchmarks.
The Franklin US Equity Bitcoin DRIP Index ETF would seek to mirror the VettaFi US Large-Cap 500 Bitcoin DRIP Index. Its equity portfolio would be tied to the 500 largest US companies by market capitalization.
The Franklin US Innovation Bitcoin DRIP Index ETF would track the VettaFi US Innovation 100 Bitcoin DRIP Index, targeting the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market.
Both funds would invest at least 80% of net assets in the securities that make up their respective indexes and in Bitcoin-related instruments corresponding to each index’s crypto allocation. At launch, each index would begin with a 95% allocation to equities and a 5% allocation to Bitcoin.
The reinvestment mechanism is the defining feature. When the underlying stocks distribute regular or special dividends, those payouts would be automatically reinvested into Bitcoin-related assets at the market open on the day after the dividend ex-date.
That turns corporate income into the funding source for crypto exposure. For investors, the pitch is not simply price appreciation from Bitcoin, but automated accumulation through the dividend stream of US companies.
Franklin built limits into the design to prevent Bitcoin from overtaking the equity base. At each quarterly review, if the Bitcoin allocation has drifted above 5%, it would be trimmed back to 4.5%. If the allocation remains at or below 5%, no downward adjustment would be made.
The indexes also include an emergency cap. If a sharp rally pushes Bitcoin exposure above 20% between scheduled reviews, the allocation would be cut back to 4.5% by the close of the second business day after the threshold is breached.
Meanwhile, the equity portion has its own concentration limits. Individual stocks are capped at 20%, while the combined weight of companies above 5% cannot exceed 40%. Those rules are designed to keep the funds from becoming overly dependent on a small group of mega-cap stocks or on Bitcoin itself.
Franklin has not disclosed the funds’ tickers, listing exchanges, fees, or expense ratios. The prospectus also states that the securities cannot be sold until the registration statement becomes effective.
Franklin Advisory Services LLC would serve as investment manager, while Franklin Templeton Institutional LLC would serve as sub-adviser. The listed portfolio managers are Dina Ting, Hailey Harris, Joe Diederich, and Basit Amin.
Franklin gives itself several routes to crypto exposure
The SEC filing gives Franklin flexibility in how the funds obtain Bitcoin exposure.
The funds may use Bitcoin-backed exchange-traded products, including products sponsored by Franklin affiliates.
They may also invest through other investment companies that provide Bitcoin exposure, futures contracts, options, depositary receipts representing ownership interests in Bitcoin, or investments held through a wholly owned Cayman Islands subsidiary.
That subsidiary is central to the tax architecture of the proposal. Each fund may invest up to 25% of total assets through a Cayman-based entity designed to help income or gains from certain Bitcoin-related investments qualify as “good income” under the US Internal Revenue Code.
Maintaining regulated investment company status is critical for the tax efficiency expected from ETF products. Franklin says it intends to limit subsidiary investments to stay within diversification requirements at each quarter-end.
The structure also introduces vulnerability. The filing warns that future Internal Revenue Service guidance, congressional legislation, or changes in tax treatment could disrupt the strategy.
If that happens, the funds may need to change their investment approach. In some circumstances, the board could approve a strategy change or liquidation.
The tax section shows the complexity behind what appears to be a simple consumer-facing idea. The headline pitch is easy to understand: stocks generate dividends, and the dividends build Bitcoin exposure.
The implementation requires a layered structure involving ETPs, derivatives, index rules, and offshore subsidiaries.
Risks follow Bitcoin into the wrapper
Franklin’s prospectus makes clear that placing Bitcoin inside an equity ETF structure does not remove the asset’s volatility.
The filing describes Bitcoin as having a limited history compared with stocks, bonds, and currency instruments. It also characterizes the digital asset market as highly speculative and warns that Bitcoin’s price can fall sharply because of regulatory changes, declining confidence, technology failures, network disruptions, or competition from other digital assets.
The document also flags market-structure concerns. Many digital asset trading venues operate with less oversight than traditional securities exchanges, creating risks tied to manipulation, fraud, theft, and limited investor recourse.
Bitcoin ownership concentration is another disclosed concern. A significant amount of Bitcoin is held by a relatively small number of large holders, often referred to as whales. Large sales or transfers by those investors could have an outsized effect on market prices.
Custody adds another layer of risk. Digital assets depend on private keys and specialized security systems, making them vulnerable to hacking, malware, operational failures, and loss. Franklin also warns that bankruptcy treatment for digital assets can remain uncertain, adding legal complexity if a custodian or service provider fails.
The funds would face further risks from the instruments used to track Bitcoin exposure. Spot Bitcoin ETPs are not registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and do not provide the same protections as traditional registered funds. Futures, options, and swaps could introduce leverage, counterparty exposure, tracking error, and losses that exceed the initial investment.
Those disclosures are important because the proposed products are designed to make Bitcoin feel more accessible to traditional investors. The familiar wrapper does not change the underlying risk profile of the digital asset.
Bitcoin ETF race shifts from access to design
Franklin’s filing comes as the Bitcoin ETF market enters a more complicated phase, with issuers trying to build new products around an asset class that has already moved quickly into mainstream portfolios.
Since their 2024 launch, US spot Bitcoin ETFs have attracted $53.40 billion in net inflows since launch and hold $78.32 billion in assets, SoSoValue data show.
These numbers reflect how rapidly the products pulled Bitcoin into brokerage accounts, model portfolios, and institutional allocation strategies.
Yet the recent flow picture has weakened. The funds have shed about $6 billion over the past six weeks during a stretch of sustained outflows.
That mix of scale and renewed pressure is pushing issuers beyond plain spot exposure. The first wave of Bitcoin ETFs gave investors regulated access to the asset. The next wave is focused on shaping how Bitcoin fits inside broader portfolios.
BlackRock has already moved in that direction with the iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF, which trades under the ticker BITA. The actively managed fund seeks to provide Bitcoin exposure while generating monthly option premiums by writing call options on IBIT, BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin ETF, across roughly 25% to 35% of the portfolio.
That strategy is aimed at investors seeking cash flow from Bitcoin’s volatility rather than only directional exposure to its price. Franklin’s proposed DRIP funds would take a different route, using stock dividends to build a capped Bitcoin allocation over time.
Together, the products point to a new phase in the Bitcoin ETF market where issuers are now competing to define whether the asset belongs in income strategies, equity portfolios, accumulation products, or other parts of traditional wealth management.
