Wouldn’t it possibly be higher to include web3 instruments into the prevailing community? Establishing a completely separate parallel set of servers and software program, and getting sufficient folks to make use of them, appears fairly expensive and tough. What about as a substitute utilizing the metadata occasions to publish web3 addresses in affiliation with a npub handle, comparable idea to https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/grasp/05.md, and together with an extra web3 generated signature as a tag for occasions you wish to be verifiably related together with your Eth pockets? The options you describe like utilizing ens and direct NFT possession checking could be doable this manner, solely wants a shopper that helps them.
I believe nostr is fairly cool however frankly the thought of a chat non-public key additionally being a cryptocurrency non-public key, which a slew of alpha high quality, web site based mostly purchasers (present nostr ecosystem) want you to enter it or generate it themselves, just isn’t sensible, since these are very totally different safety fashions they need to be dealt with individually, no person needs to be copy pasting Ethereum non-public keys into shitty web sites or utilizing keys generated on the identical for crypto transactions. On the flip aspect you should not must approve a signature in your web3 pockets each time you ship a chat message.
Subsequently I believe not a lot would actually be misplaced by as a substitute writing instruments to allow web3 performance with the prevailing protocol, since two units of separate keys are the precise technique to do it anyway. Possibly I am lacking some potentialities although, unsure.
